The American Truth Machine

June 17, 2009

Socialism is for Wimps

Filed under: Politics

I have had enough of people my age talking about the virtues of Socialism.  No truly great country has survived under socialism.  It makes people lazy.  And most people who advocate it are lazy too, which is a good thing because it means the chances of America going socialist are lessened.  Still, we are taking steps towards socialism in many ways, one of which is healthcare. 

I’m really not in the mood to rail against government-run health care right now, but I do have some inconvenient questions to ask all you liberals out there:

  1. How the hell do you think we can treat an extra 46 million people with the doctors we have now?
  2. How the hell are we going to pay for this?
  3. Since when was health care a right (on the same lines as speech, religion, protest)? 
  4. Since when was the government good at doing anything?
  5. Even if the initial plan isn’t "government-run", isn’t that the ultimate goal?
  6. Who gave the government the power to force people to have health care?
I expect some answers.

April 11, 2009

Eric Holder Politicizing Justice

Filed under: Politics

Remember hearing how the Bush Administration "politicized" the Justice Department?  Well, it seems that Eric Holder, the new Attorney General, is doing just that.  Of all the Obama appointees, Holder is the worst.  Sure, Geithner is a tax cheat, but at least he hasn’t done anything a congressional investigation called "unconscionable."  Here’s part of a great article from the Washington Post:

 

Intense controversy has flared in recent years over a previously obscure but high-powered office in the Department of Justice — the Office of Legal Counsel. OLC has traditionally provided the final word to executive branch officials on the meaning of the Constitution and federal statutes. Disputes over whether it faithfully carried out its assigned role in national security matters during the Bush administration have erupted on newspaper front pages. Whatever the merits of those disputes, virtually everyone has agreed that it is imperative that OLC provide high-quality legal advice that is not slanted to advance a president’s policy agenda — and that the president and his top advisers respect that advice.

But now it appears that we have an attorney general who is himself running roughshod over OLC.

During Eric Holder’s confirmation process, his tenure as deputy attorney general in the Clinton administration sparked serious concerns among senators. In scandals involving Clinton’s pardons of Puerto Rican nationalists and fugitive Marc Rich, Holder had violated departmental protocols, ignored the views of victims and law enforcement professionals, colluded with Rich’s attorneys, undermined prosecutors and circumvented DOJ’s pardon attorney. A congressional investigation in 2002 called his conduct "unconscionable."

At his recent confirmation hearing, a chastened Holder assured senators that he had learned from the past and was committed to upholding the department’s high standards. He specifically promised not to politicize DOJ’s legal positions: "We don’t change OLC opinions simply because a new administration takes over," he said. Any review "will not be a political process, it will be one based solely on our interpretation of the law."

Alas, less than two months into his tenure as attorney general, according to accounts in The Post last week, Holder has abused OLC for partisan political purposes. The facts, admittedly, are somewhat sketchy — largely because Holder isn’t complying with President Obama’s promise of transparency. But here’s what they show.

 

November 28, 2008

The Election: My Analysis

Filed under: Politics

It’s been nearly a month since the election, and I have finally decided to give my opinion on it.  Obviously I am personally disappointed by the outcome.  I really wanted John McCain to win.  And not just because he had an ‘R’ next to his name, but because he is a man of great character.  Unlike many other conservatives, I believe he was the best candidate for the Republicans.  Where they disdain him for his independent, mavericky, spirit, I applaud him for taking on his own political party and being his own man.  Sadly, John McCain was too old, and the Republican brand too damaged, for him to come out on top.  Against a man that could have been his son, he looked tired.  However, for a man in his seventies he sure has a ton of energy.  He campaigned like a man half his age.  However he missed his chance to shake up the race when he voted with Barack Obama for the bailout.  Had he voted differently, the race may have changed.  But probably not, because Bush has really screwed things up for the GOP.  

With the Republican brand damaged, a new group of younger leadership will emerge.  But for now, the Democrats control both houses of Congress and, come January 20th, the White House.  There is no doubt the this situation will shift our policies to the left, but hopefully Barack Obama, suppossedly a pragmatic leader, will see that too hard a shift to the left will be met with strong backlash.  I am truley proud that a black man has risen to the Presidency, I just wish that man was a black man who didn’t worship at the altar of the far-left.  Reverend Jerimiah Wright, Willaim Ayers, and other shady characters that Obama alligned himself with over the years cast a bad light of the character of the President-elect.  It seems that he alligned himself with these people because they would help him get somewhere in politics, not because he agrees wholeheartedly with them.  But we will have to wait and see. 

As someone who aspires to the Presidency myself someday, I respect Barack Obama’s political genius. He motivated more new voters than ever before and received the most votes of any Presidential candidate ever.  That is quite an achievement.  Still, I strongly disagree with his policies.  

Whether he will go far-left or center-left is still unclear, but we can look to his voting record and his cabinet choices for a window to the future.  In the senate, he had the most liberal voting record one year, and very liberal ratings the other years.  If he is a moderate, he has certainly masked it pretty darn well.  In his campaign however, he acted fairly moderate.  Nothing too liberal about the word "change."  That’s really all his campaign was anyway, right? As for his cabinet appointments, I will have more to say on that later.  But he is not surrounding himself with kooks.  A lot are Clintonistas, including Hillary herself, so I guess "change" really is just a word.  But still, no one far-left.  But still definetly left.  

The real deciding factor is if Nancy Pelosi gets all her far-left ideas put into practice, or if Barack Obama realizes she is a crazy bitch and should be ignored.  Let’s hope for the latter.  Just keep in mind that politics is a pendulum, and soon (perhaps in 2010) Republicans will actually gain seats in the House and Senate.  

President-elect Barack Obama faces one of the greatest challenges of any Chief-Executive in our history.  Every day you turn on the TV to CNN or Fox News, and it seems another sector of the economy is in trouble.  Politicians in Washington will look to Barack Obama for leadership.  Right now, as Americans, we should support the President-elect.  He deserves at least a few weeks in office before we pass major judgement on him.  And when that time comes, I will be here on this blog to give my thoughts.  

     

August 21, 2008

The Veepstakes (Obama)

Filed under: Politics

Every political junkie out there is asking the same question:  Who the hell is Obama going to pick for his Veep.  Well, as I said in an earlier post, I believe he will pick Biden.  However, that prediction was made a long time ago, and I am gradually thinking he may pick Evan Bayh.  However, I believe that may be a mistake, seeing as Bayh is not very exciting.  Sure, Biden might not be able to shut-up, but at least he brings a lot to the table.  Bayh might win Indiana for Obama, but come on!  Indiana???  If Obama really wants to win a red state, he should try for Virginia.  But even then, choosing a VP based on winning one lousy state is not worth it.  Obama needs to pick someone with gravitas who is also a great campaigner.  That man is Joe Biden.  Sure, there are lots of videos out there of Biden saying stupid things, and Rush Limbaugh has endorsed Biden for the Veep position, but hey, who cares?  Biden brings foreign policy experience to the table.  Plus, his son is going to be deployed to Iraq. This may sound shallow, but the McCain camp can’t paint the Obama camp as out of touch with the troops on the ground if one of there own is on the battle field.  Also, Biden has a good quote about leaving Iraq.  From The Page: 

“I don’t want him going,” Biden told an Iowa state fair crowd a year ago, when, as a presidential candidate, he learned that his son’s unit would be deployed at some point in 2008.

“But I don’t want my grandsons or granddaughters going back in 15 years. So how we leave makes a big difference.”

It will be difficult for the RNC and McCain to call Obama’s plan a "Precipitous Withdrawal" with Biden’s situation.  

As for the other Veepstakes contenders, I find it hard to believe that Obama will pick Tim Kaine of Viginia.  Why?  Just say Obama-Kaine ‘08.  It sound like "Oh, Bomb McCain."  

What about Hillary???  BAD IDEA.  SHE WILL HURT OBAMA BECAUSE SHE IS CRAZY.  BILL IS CRAZY AS WELL.

July 24, 2008

Sorry for Not Blogging

Hello.  Sorry for not blogging in a while.  I was away, and then I was just lazy.  Here is my take on the stuff that’s happening now.  

Obama Oversees:  Publicity stunt.  He is acting like he is already the President.  Almost Arrogant.

Veepstakes:  McCain-Romney; Obama-Biden.   Why???  Because McCain needs a semi-youthful guy who is business oreinted, and Obama needs a semi-old guy who knows about foreign policy.  Romney would accept, but I don’t know about Biden.  As chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, he is very influencial and important to the Democratic party.  

Estelle Getty:  She made The Golden Girls golden.   

June 22, 2008

Tom Brokaw to MTP

Filed under: Politics

At the end of Meet the Press this Sunday, fill-in Brian Williams announced that Tom Brokaw would act as moderator for the broadcast up to the election. 

IMO, this is a great idea.  Brokaw is an experienced journalist and the elder of NBC News.  He broke the news of his friend Tim Russert’s passing and it makes sense that he fill’s Tim’s shoes.  Best of luck to Tom.

June 20, 2008

Scott McClellan on the Hill

Filed under: Politics

Today, Scott McClellan testifies under oath before the House Judiciary Committee as part of the CIA Leak Investigation, starting at 9:30 a.m.  According to the A.P., Vice President Cheney’s role in the leak will be the focus of the testimony.  However, Karl Rove, former White House Deputy Chief of Staff and current Fox News Contributor, may be mentioned as well. 

More to come…

June 19, 2008

The Truth: Oil Crisis

Let’s face it.  Over $4 a gallon for gas is ridiculous, and it is hurting the middle-class and, thus, damaging our economy.  As long as oil floats around $130-140 a barrel, than we are screwed.  There are many possible courses of action in dealing with this problem, but of course no one can agree on which is the best.  Here is my opinion:  No one course of action will get us off of foreign energy, lower gas prices, and increase national security.  What we need is a confluence of actions to get us out of this crisis.  And yes, it is a crisis.   

So, what do we need to do?

  • Increase domestic production
  • Decrease consumption
  • More alternative energies

It all comes down to those few things.  In fact, you can simplify it to decrease comsumption and increase production.  Now of course, decreasing consumption of anything is usually bad for the economy because out economic system thrives on consumption.  Plus, the less  mid-east oil we consume, the more China is able to get.  Any consumption that we don’t do, they will do it. You could say that China will do the job that Americans don’t want to do.  However, as of right now, it seems that Americans don’t really want to consume less.  Many people are still driving around in there big SUV’s.  Of course, there are signs that the tides are shifting.  More people are buying economy cars (truck and SUV sales are tanking) and more people are taking public transportation.  But still, most people, at $4 a gallon, are unwilling to make major changes to their habits.  

It will take years for gas consumption to go down, and it will happen more because of an influx of alternative energies to the market rather than less consumption.  Cars will be built more efficiently, but most people don’t buy new cars every few years.   

We certainly could increase domestic production.  Drilling offshore, in ANWAR, even in areas of Montana and Wyoming.  However, powerful environmental groups are against eny such action.  They say it will have little effect on the price but devestaing effects on the environment.  I saw that’s a buch of crap.  All the government needs to do is open up these areas of exploration.  The oil companies will make the decision as to whether or not we should drill there.  LET THE FREE MARKET WORK.  And with the new types of drilling technology out there, we CAN drill and be environmentally responsible.  By the way, after Hurricane Katrina, no oil was leaked into the Gulf of Mexico from oil rigs.  Those things are built like tanks. 

So, when can we see lower prices?  One chance is after the Beijing Olympics, when China should stop stockpiling oil (thanks, Stuart Varney of Fox Business for that).  Until then, we might be in for a tought time.  We must get off foreign oil, for National Security and our economy.  If we don’t, our country will face irreparable harm.  

Some scars can’t be fixed.  This is one that will be permanent.     

Remembering Russert

Filed under: Politics, True Heroes

Last Friday was a sad day for America.  We lost one of the greatest journalists on all time.  Tim Russert was more than just a great journalist.  He was also a great father, son, husband, and role-model.  He was one of the good guys.

I found this tribute by a role-model of mine to be apropos:  

 

Check out Mark Anticole’s comic strip at killjoycomics.com 

May 15, 2008

Edwards Endorses Obama

Filed under: Politics

The long awaited endorsement of Sentator Barack Obama by former Senator John Edwards finally happened. 

From CNN.com:


Former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards endorsed Sen. Barack Obama on Wednesday at a campaign event in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John Edwards in a CNN sponsored debate in South Carolina in January.

"The reason I’m here tonight is because the Democratic voters have made their choice, and so have I," he told the boisterous crowd.

"There is one man who knows and understands that this is a time for bold leadership. There is one man that knows how to create the change, the lasting change, that you have to build from the ground up," Edwards said. "There is one man who knows in his heart there is time to create one America, not two … and that man is Barack Obama."

Read the full article hear 

Does anyone really believe this means anything? After all, John Edwards still has a lot of baggage left over from the 2004 Pres. campaign.   






















Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by B A Khan